Entries by Rebecca Hawkins

EPEAT Clarification #30 Revision B

EPEAT Clarification #30 Revision B: Clarification #30 was revised to include an additional test procedure (RAL-UZ 205) as functionally equivalent with the calculation of emissions by RAL-UZ 122 as specified in 1680.2: criterion 4.10.1.1.  This is in addition to RAL-UZ 171 which was previously found to be functionally equivalent to RAL-UZ 122.

EPEAT Clarification #40 Posted for 30 Day Comment Period

EPEAT Clarification #40: Participating EPEAT Manufacturers have requested an acceptable approach for using analytical test data that can be used to demonstrate conformance to 1680.1: Criterion 4.1.6.2. Draft Revision A of this Clarification went out for public comment in 2016.  This Clarification reflects updates based on those comments.  Due to changes in the Clarification, it […]

Clarification #38 relating to PCs and Displays criterion 4.8.2.2 now available

Clarification #38 relating to PCs and Displays criterion 4.8.2.2 now available This Clarification #38 is regarding evidence required to prove recycling for cardboard and other fiber-based materials (i.e. derived from a natural fiber) in PC and Displays criterion 4.8.2.2. The Clarification can be found here.  Please note there is a separate Clarification for the same […]

Updated Clarification #32 relating to Imaging Equipment criteria 4.5.2.1, 4.5.2.2 and 4.7.3.1

Updated Clarification #32 relating to Imaging Equipment criteria 4.5.2.1, 4.5.2.2 and 4.7.3.1 Clarification #32 has been updated for Imaging Equipment criteria 4.5.2.1, 4.5.2.2 and 4.7.3.1.  The biggest change is that Clarification approves for use additional Product Category Rules. Comments will be accepted from all interested stakeholders until March 6, 2017.  The Clarification can be found […]

Clarification #39 Open for Public Comment

  Clarification #39 Open for Public Comment   The Green Electronics Council has incorporated comments from participating EPEAT Manufacturers on the first version of this Clarification and is now sending the clarification out for another 30-day comment period. EPEAT Manufacturers have requested clarity on what evidence is needed for PC/Display criterion 4.8.2.2 verification requirement b), […]