Entries by Rebecca Hawkins

Clarification #39 Revision C Open for Public Comment

Clarification #39 Revision C Open for Public Comment The Green Electronics Council has incorporated comments from participating EPEAT Manufacturers on the second version of this Clarification and is now sending the clarification out for another 30-day comment period. EPEAT Manufacturers have requested clarity on what evidence is needed for PC/Display criterion 4.8.2.2 verification requirement b), […]

Verification Round PC-2017-02 Begins April 10, 2017

Verification Round PC-2017-02 Begins April 10,2017 Verification Round PC-2017-02 for PCs and Displays begins April 10, 2017.  This round will focus on criteria with high rates of Non-Conformance and criteria that have not been verified recently.  The round plan can be viewed here.

EPEAT Clarification #30 Revision B

EPEAT Clarification #30 Revision B: Clarification #30 was revised to include an additional test procedure (RAL-UZ 205) as functionally equivalent with the calculation of emissions by RAL-UZ 122 as specified in 1680.2: criterion 4.10.1.1.  This is in addition to RAL-UZ 171 which was previously found to be functionally equivalent to RAL-UZ 122.

EPEAT Clarification #40 Posted for 30 Day Comment Period

EPEAT Clarification #40: Participating EPEAT Manufacturers have requested an acceptable approach for using analytical test data that can be used to demonstrate conformance to 1680.1: Criterion 4.1.6.2. Draft Revision A of this Clarification went out for public comment in 2016.  This Clarification reflects updates based on those comments.  Due to changes in the Clarification, it […]

Clarification #38 relating to PCs and Displays criterion 4.8.2.2 now available

Clarification #38 relating to PCs and Displays criterion 4.8.2.2 now available This Clarification #38 is regarding evidence required to prove recycling for cardboard and other fiber-based materials (i.e. derived from a natural fiber) in PC and Displays criterion 4.8.2.2. The Clarification can be found here.  Please note there is a separate Clarification for the same […]