Participate in EPEAT         EPEAT Partner Programs         EPEAT Standards Development         Newsroom         Contact Us  
EPEAT

SEARCH THE
REGISTRY

  DETAILS
EPEAT Criteria
International Registration
Participating Manufacturers
Purchasers/RFPs Using EPEAT
Environmental Benefits
Product Verification

  RESOURCES
Purchasers
Manufacturers
Resellers
Individual Consumers
Small Business

  BACKGROUND
EPEAT Background
EPEAT and Energy Star
Reference Documents and Links
FAQs
 
9/2/2010 11:33:35 AM
Product Verification

Verification Round Documents  |   Verification Protocols  |   Verification Clarifications  |   Verification Personnel

Verification Overview

In the EPEAT system, manufacturers add their products to the registry by declaring that the products meet specific individual criteria of IEEE 1680.  Product declarations are not precertified; however manufacturers must be able upon request at any time following product registration to produce the required supporting evidence spelled out in the IEEE standard. In order to maintain the credibility of the system, EPEAT periodically selects a batch of products and criteria from the registry and verifies that they meet the criteria as declared.

All criteria declared by all products on the registry are subject to verification at any time. Criteria are selected for investigation by the Product Verification Committee (PVC) based on random selection, environmental significance, or the expectation that a criterion may be difficult to meet or highly significant in terms of environmental impact.

The verification process may simply require a manufacturer to provide production reports, lab analysis or other data, or EPEAT may independently obtain products and subject them to detailed laboratory analysis or destructive disassembly.

PLEASE NOTE: Stakeholders are encouraged to contact EPEAT if they have good reason to doubt the veracity of a product declaration; their concern can trigger a special investigation of criteria or products or inclusion in an upcoming verification round. Purchasers with questions about a product proffered in response to a bid tender may request an expedited review.

While EPEAT will work with manufacturers to correct or clarify a nonconforming declaration, if a manufacturer is found over time to be an untrustworthy user, they may be barred from using the EPEAT system.

 

Why not Precertify?

EPEAT’s unconventional approach - product declaration by the manufacturer, followed by registry surveillance and ongoing verification investigation -  was decided upon by the stakeholders during development of the IEEE 1680 standard.

The group very carefully  considered the most effective way to maintain the credibility of the Registry based on the unique characteristics of these high-tech products:

  1. Very rapid technology development,
  2. Very short time to market
  3. Very complex and continually morphing global supply chains, and
  4. Very high variability in the configurations of individual products (components from totally different manufacturers may be found inside of the "same product" over time )

Electronic and computer products experience as high as a 70% rate of changes in components, sourcing  and other elements from the original product launch through the commercial  life of a given model . Given this rate of change, a precertification based on a one-time investigation before a product is on the market is fundamentally inadequate to assess IT equipment as it will be delivered to the purchaser. Stakeholders recognized that ongoing and randomly timed surveillance is the best way to identify potential problems.

Therefore, in accordance with to the IEEE 1680 standard, EPEAT has developed rigorous and transparent post-declaration verification procedures based on unannounced and very in-depth investigations, and on public exposure in case of non-conformances. The system is designed to make nonconformance publicly embarrassing, and to maintain the constant likelihood of investigation at any time.

 

Verification Plans and Outcome Reports

    Round 2010-3 Documents  (Verification Plan)

    Round 2010-2 Documents  (Verification Plan, Outcomes Report)

    Round 2010-1 Documents  (Verification Plan, Outcomes Report)

    Round Four Documents  (Verification Plan, Outcomes Report)

    Round Three Documents (Verification Plan, Outcomes Report)

    Round Two Documents (Verification Plan, Outcomes Report)

    Round One Documents (Verification Plan, Outcomes Report)

Special Investigation - November 2009



Verification Protocols

The EPEAT Conformity Assessment Protocols contain extremely detailed information on the information manufacturers must provide and systems they must have in place to demonstrate conformance with each individual IEEE 1680 criterion.

The protocols also contain all Interpretations and Clarifications of the IEEE 1680 criteria issued by the Product Verification Committee and/or the IEEE Stakeholder Interpretations group, which address how the criteria will be applied and interpreted in the verification process. Those are also available separately through an Index of Standard Interpretations and Clarifications



    

Verification Clarifications Reports

Clarifications Reports are documents issued by EPEAT and/or the PVC, usually in response to questions posed by subscribing manufacturers when they declare their products, that are intended to clarify how EPEAT and the PVC interpret certain requirements of IEEE 1680.



Verification Personnel

Two different independent parties are involved in EPEAT verification.

Product Verification Committee

The Product Verification Committee or “PVC” develops and approves the plan for each verification round, and makes the final decisions regarding each product’s conformance or nonconformance to each criterion.

The members of the PVC are independent experts on electronics and the environment and are contractors to EPEAT. Their pay is independent of their decisions, they are required to maintain independence from any EPEAT subscribing manufacturers, and they are generally blind to the identity of the products and manufacturers they are deciding.

Qualified Verifiers

Each verification investigation is assigned to a Qualified Verifier (QV). The QV obtains and evaluates data from Subscribers and makes a recommendation of conformance or nonconformance for review by the PVC. QVs are independent experts on electronics and the environment on contract to EPEAT; they are required to maintain independence from EPEAT-subscribing manufacturers, and their pay is independent of their recommendations. QV’s usually communicate with manufacturers to obtain the information they need to complete verification processes.

Contacting verifiersWe ask that stakeholders refrain from contacting the Product Verification Committee or individual Verifiers directly regarding EPEAT and verification, to maintain their independence of judgment. They may be contacted through EPEAT if needed.